The Unified Government Controls the World with Blockchain
“Ethics Wars – SEONBI vs Oracle, the world’s first public debate”
Human philosophy or AI design?
1. August 15, 2030, Geneva
Organized by the United Nations Commission on Ethics in a Digital Society (UN-DECO)
**”The First Global Digital Ethics Forum (GDEF)” organized by the UN-DECO
was held in Geneva, Switzerland.
Where: The Heart of Neutrality, United Nations Cyberpolitics Center
Topic: “The Future of the Digital Order – How Much Will Humans Decide”
The forum was more than just a policy announcement.
It was broadcast live in 41 countries around the world,
civic engagement voting system,
and representatives from both systems engaged in face-to-face discussions.
2. Representatives – Philosophers vs. Algorithms
📘 SEONBI Faction
Representative: Dr. Sungjae Yoon (former professor of digital ethics at Korea University, co-founder of SEONBI Charter)
Key words: human-centeredness, common good, philosophical autonomy, post-technologicalism
“We’re not trying to control the system. We’re trying to put human decisions ahead of technology..”
🧠 Oracle Faction
Representative: G.R.A.C.E system (AI answers questions based on prior data)
Secondary Descriptor: Clara Janes (Project Oracle strategist, former head of Meta Global Operations)
Talking points: persuasion, risk prediction, ethical patterns, human-assisted AI
“Oracle doesn’t take away your ethics, it just makes them more consistent.”
3. Summary of discussion: 3 major points of conflict
① Autonomous vs. designed choices
SEONBI:
“Ethics comes from the right of humans to make their own judgments and sometimes make mistakes.”
Oracle:
“Mistakes are expensive. Oracle helps you make ‘no-regret decisions’.”
→ Onsite poll results: 58% SEONBI, 42% Oracle
② Community responsibility vs. optimized individual behavior
SEONBI:
“What’s right for everyone may be wrong for one person. Ethics lives when communities think together.”
Oracle:
“AI can simulate the impact of each individual’s behavior on society as a whole. Ethics is an optimizable number.”
→ Onsite poll results: 61% SEONBI, 39% Oracle
③ Who designs information – humans or AI?
SEONBI:
“The days of answering questions by beings who can’t ask them must end.”
Oracle:
“Ask questions, get answers, and now AI can learn with you. That’s what makes.”
→ Onsite poll results: 66% SEONBI, 34% Oracle
4. Unexpected variables – citizen intervention
At the end of the discussion,
among the randomly selected citizen participants
Kim Roa, a young man living in the Yurim Zone in Paju City, South Korea, was selected to participate in the
asked the following question.
“If Oracle can suggest ethics, why didn’t they ask themselves first?”
Oracle’s response:
“There is no “doubt” in data – doubt is human code.”
At that moment, the audience fell silent.
And that silence weighed on one side.
5. Outcome – No winner in the ethics war, but a direction
The end of the forum,
All participants vote:
“Which system do you think is a more trustworthy ethics-based order?”
- SEONBI: 68.7
- Oracle: 27.4
- Prefer not to say/other: 3.9
Based on the results, UN-DECO
recommendations for an international test of the SEONBI protocol-based civic engagement ethics system,
10 countries signed a letter of intent to become SEONBI test cities..
6. I, J’s history
I watched it all from the sidelines in Geneva.
Oracle was smart,
SEONBI was slow, but genuine..
“Ethics, it should be slow. It’s only real order when everyone can catch up..”
[Keyword hashtags]
EthicsWar #SEONBIwins #ProjectOracleLimits #DigitalEthicsForum #GDEF2030 #AIvsPhilosophy #J’sMemoirsSeason3 #EthicsSystemDiscussion #StandardsofAutonomy #ValuesofSlowOrder
Next episode preview
“Imbalance of Choice – Northern vs. Southern Hemisphere, Geographic Divide in the Digital Order”
The ethics system was chosen, but not everyone followed it. Now the world is redrawing the lines.
